When Did Obama Become A Democrat, He Was A New Party When He Won His State Senate Seat.?
November 11th, 2009 | 
Author: The ‘New Party’ was a political party established by the Democratic Socialists of America (the DSA) to push forth the socialist principles of the DSA by focusing on winnable elections at a local level and spreading the Socialist movement upwards…
The “New Party” claimed Barack Obama was a card carrying member in a 1996 newsletter found on internet archive.
New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.
Posted in 
Tags:
The sad thing is they don’t care. They claim we are the ignorant ones, but the truth is Obama is counting on the uneducated lower class and mis-educated colleg grad/liberal proselytes to vote for him.
I went to a state college in the deep south and it was a liberal training camp!
I actually recall the New Party…ultra-left people, been subsumed since by ultra-left part of Progressive wing of Democratic party.
Listen, friend, Obama was NOT a member of New Party. New Party at that time, was mad at Bill Clinton for espousing some moderate/conservative policies like welfare reform. They would have listed Obama as their candidate of choice, because he was a Democrat running for State Senate in Chicago, which he was going to get elected to once he won the primary. If they listed him as ‘New Party’ it was because they were trying to play up their own credentials, to say that they were somehow important and that their ‘candidate’ won. It’s like picking the Yankees to win the World Series before two years ago. Purely propaganda by people not even remotely affiliated with Obama. (God, those people were annoying.)
Yes,he was a member.
Obama was an active member of the now-defunct socialist New Party! “Chicago DSA is affiliated with the national Democratic Socialists of America.” From October 1996: “Three NP-members won Democratic primaries last Spring and face off against Republican opponents on election day: Danny Davis (U.S. House), Barack Obama (State Senate) and Patricia Martin (Cook County Judiciary).” November 2006: “New Party member Barack Obama was uncontested for a State Senate seat from Chicago.” [More to follow in separate post, such as Obama’s ideas on social wages and redistribution of wealth.—http://noquarterusa.net/blog/2008/10/08/…
Once again Miss Kitty you piqued my interest. Thanks. After a few Google reports, I find that Barry’s early socialist/communist learning & mentoring by Frank Marshall Davis paid off by getting this New Party support you mentioned.
It would seem the Democrat party is actually the party of Socialists, of which I find more proof every day.
BHO was born to a communist backer, brought up by socialist/communist, ran successfully for office under a socialist banner & now, despite the moniker of Democrat, is STILL a socialist.
What scares me is so much support for him by people that know this. Does that mean the majority in the US are now Socialists?
Yes, he was a member of the New Socialist Party in the 1990’s. He only changed to Democrat to get on a major party’s ticket.
For those that say it doesn’t matter, please tell me WHY Obama conveniently forgot to mention this?
For those that want proof. See my sources below.
Because he knew a Republican would never but his kool-aid. and he need a party to destroy the untied states so he picked the party that would help him do that because they like and need the freebies. Republicans have to work they don’t have time for his rhetoric.
I didn’t need this info to know barry was a socialist. Makes sense his connection with Ayres, dont you think? Both have strong socialist/communist upbringings & stances. Both practices undermining American priniciples & seek strong central gov’t control.
It would seem the USSR sleeper cells are awakening.
As always Kitty you ask the best questions, Obama is in reality a communist running as a democrat he had to registeras one to mask his true nature
YOU REALLY HIT IT OUT OF THE PARK ON THIS ONE. AS USUAL IT SEEMS ANY MENTION OF B. HUSSEIN OBAMA’S RADICAL TIES GET THE LIBERALS PANTIES IN A BUNCH.
Listen. These are the kind of credentials Liberals look for….
when shopping for a candidate.
From what I’ve been able to research the Socialist “New Party” simply evolved into the more acceptable “main stream” Democratic Party. They carried their same ideals, their same concepts and their same political ambitions with them. They just wore different cloaks and hats.
That’s the trouble today with so many in this country! They’re so ignorant to the ways of politicians. They don’t know that Franklin Roosevelt was a Republican but changed to a Democrat to win the Presidency… And he’s gone down as the Greatest President in American History!!
So you just never know what’s behind your candidates party ties!!
EDITED!!…..
I was just thinking about some of my people who fought so hard in the coal mining wars, & in other occupations, to get the unions in years ago when they were so desperately needed. They were called Socialists!! I’m so proud of them and always will be. If they were really Socialists then I don’t think Obama fits that bill!
The New Party simply endorsed Obama, he was not technically a member. It was just something to help him get his seat, as any politician would go for. The party was short-lived and had little influence anyway.
P.S. “Obama wears combat sandals”…your source is ludicrous. Its a highly conservative article with so much bias no credible journalist would consider that to be worth reading. Good try, though.
P.S.S Yes, I wasn’t talking about endorsing now. I’m talking about back in 1996…they only endorsed him. The party only lasted until 1998, also. He was not a member. He was a member of the Democratic Party. The only thing saying he was a member of the New Party is conservative blogs: surprise, surprise.
Luke D. is right. The next time you feel like stretching the truth provide a source… Obama was always a member of the Democratic party. Of course, if you provided a source in this matter it would have contradicted your premise.
You should really research stuff like this better.
(And a source from a credible and objective source… not a right-wing anti-Obama blog)